E-Verify: Don't Let the Perfect Be the Enemy of the Good
The French philosopher Voltaire once wrote, "Don't let the perfect be the enemy of the good." It's a simple yet profound phrase. There is little in life that is perfect, so we must constantly ask ourselves if the benefits out-weigh the risks. When we are sick, we take medicine that helps us, even though there is a small chance of unpleasant side-effects. Yet, we trust our doctors and fill those prescriptions, because the benefits far out-weigh the risks, and over time, those risks might be ameliorated. What if we all decided not to use medicine because of a small risk of side-effects? We would probably see life expectancy drop, more illnesses, and a reduced quality of life, all because we allowed the perfect to be the enemy of the good.
I chose to use a health example, but if you think closely, you will likely find a plethora of examples. Hopefully, we are able to intelligently balance the risks and rewards in order to prevent the perfect from becoming the enemy of the good. Besides our private lives, this type of "cost benefit analysis" is also useful in the political sphere. For a good example, you need to look no further than the debate over E-Verify.
E-Verify is a government database used by many states to discern whether someone is in the United States legally. Many states have decided to use E-Verify to assure that only legal residents are able to find work. Most people would agree that it isn't perfect. Despite this, it is usually correct. My workplace is required to use E-Verify and we didn't have any problems. With that said, problems can occur, and when they do, they can be corrected. For the vast majority of residents, E-Verify works well. Admittedly, it isn't perfect, but it is still highly effective.
You will hear advocates for illegal immigrants and open borders criticize E-Verify for its lack of perfection. They will ignore the fact that it usually works just fine. They are allowing the perfect to be the enemy of the good, but not because they misunderstand the distinction. It is do to their agenda, which is to allow as many illegal immigrants into the United States as possible. Those who oppose E-Verify either favor open borders, or are set to benefit from illegal immigration. When you hear debates about E-Verify, be sure to keep this in mind.
I chose to use a health example, but if you think closely, you will likely find a plethora of examples. Hopefully, we are able to intelligently balance the risks and rewards in order to prevent the perfect from becoming the enemy of the good. Besides our private lives, this type of "cost benefit analysis" is also useful in the political sphere. For a good example, you need to look no further than the debate over E-Verify.
E-Verify is a government database used by many states to discern whether someone is in the United States legally. Many states have decided to use E-Verify to assure that only legal residents are able to find work. Most people would agree that it isn't perfect. Despite this, it is usually correct. My workplace is required to use E-Verify and we didn't have any problems. With that said, problems can occur, and when they do, they can be corrected. For the vast majority of residents, E-Verify works well. Admittedly, it isn't perfect, but it is still highly effective.
You will hear advocates for illegal immigrants and open borders criticize E-Verify for its lack of perfection. They will ignore the fact that it usually works just fine. They are allowing the perfect to be the enemy of the good, but not because they misunderstand the distinction. It is do to their agenda, which is to allow as many illegal immigrants into the United States as possible. Those who oppose E-Verify either favor open borders, or are set to benefit from illegal immigration. When you hear debates about E-Verify, be sure to keep this in mind.




Support the revised (SAVE) Act as it targets employers with stiff penalties for hiring illegal aliens, secures the northern and southern border by adding 8,000 new border patrol agents and increases interior enforcement by allowing for additional federal district court judges and provides more resources for law enforcement officers. In this package E-Verify would be mandatory, in-perpetuity driving illegal labor from the workplace. Rep. Heath Schuler's e-verification program, would require federal agencies, contractors and employers to verify the eligibility of --ALL EMPLOYEES--within one to four years, depending on the size of the company. Using this procedure, identity fraud wrought through fake social security numbers and bogus ID's would be reduced significantly.
This is not about discrimination because E-verify is activated after someone has been hired,” Shuler said. “This helps to ensure that local officials can identify who they arrest. Interior enforcement is crucial.” It's essential that Americans back him and his sponsors when the act is introduced in the next few weeks. This is namely after Sen. Harry Reid(D-NV) and speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) silently neutralized E-Verify, plus 48 other members of the Senate. We cannot trust these pro-illegal immigrant--PARIAH--cheap labor--BUSINESS politicians. With over 12 million Americans out of work and large numbers of new veterans entering the workplace, we cannot accept any legalization of 13 to 20 million foreign nationals. Offer your support to Rep.Shuler (D-NC) on his gov website. Phone: 828-252-1651 Learn more at NUMBERSUSA
Reply to this